this site takes a stand against the irresponsible use of force.
one glaring picture was that presented by the security personnel of the golf course..
he related in his testimony that when he arrived at the scene after the mauling...he saw mr. de la paz and son bloodied while mr. pangandaman and sons were also there so with their 'bodyguards' armed with 'high caliber' weapons.
this scene alone will tell us that there was an intimidating presence of a far more superior force against a father and his 14 yr. old son so with the 18 yr. old daughter, bambee.
and they were at the receiving end of an unjustified use of force...senseless violence!
a 14 yr. old may resort to the use of force, instinctively, when exposed to the acts committed against his father. only in a dysfunctional family is it deemed not possible but neither is the reaction totally improbable.
this is what connects us all. you do as much as raise an accussing finger on the face of either my mom or dad and i can guarantee you a fury like you've never before seen in your life.
to the young, a father is a hero, a role model. within the ranks of batman, superman, or say braveheart. no father in his right mind would expose the children to any form of danger.
that is human nature and all the lies in the world cannot change that.
the law only aggravates an act of physical injury when it is committed against a public official. it is silent with regard to a reversal in the situation.
relative to committing an offense on the parents within the full view of the offspring, we have under our penal code considered as an aggravating circumstance the said scenario a provision in the crime of rape.
though they similarly take away human dignity in varying degrees.